Looks like guys from 3DNews forgot to adjust their clocks..
Test platform
| Testbed configuration | |
|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4 GHz (100 MHz × 40), the constant frequency |
| Motherboard | ASUS RAMPAGE V EXTREME |
| RAM | Corsair Vengeance LPX, 2133 MHz, 4 × 4 GB |
| Storage | Intel SSD 520 240 GB + Crucial M550 512GB |
| Power Supply | Corsair AX1200i, 1200 W |
| CPU Cooler | Thermalright Archon |
| Case | CoolerMaster Test Bench V1.0 |
| Monitor | NEC EA244UHD |
| Operating System | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
| Software GPU AMD | |
| All cards | Unknown (Tesselation: Use application settings) |
| Software GPU NVIDIA | |
| All cards | Unknown |
Benchmarks
Overclocking
Peak frequency – 2126 MHz.
Machine translation of the conclusion:
Thus, a small compromise in specifications GeForce GTX 1080 Ti looks rather an attempt to reduce the cost of video card than to differentiate it from the TITAN X. More addition, NVIDIA has improved “physical” parameters of the board – the efficiency of the cooling system efficiency and power, eventually depriving TITAN X residues practical values. The latter, at a price of $ 500 above, the buyer can give only moral satisfaction from owning a bit more powerful GPU. At TITAN X share also remain specific scenario calculation problems, which are absolutely necessary to have 12 GB of RAM.
Source: 3DNews (link dead)
