AMD Radeon R9 Nano to compete against GeForce GTX 970 in Mini-ITX form factor

Published: 26th Aug 2015, 08:48 GMT

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs GTX 970 Mini ITX


While it’s always good to base your opinion on “independent” reviews, official marketing materials are just as important. Still, it is worth taking them with a grain of salt. 

AMD Radeon R9 Nano is 30% faster than GeForce GTX 970 MiniITX

Yesterday we posted the full R9 Nano specs sheet, which revealed that the card features 4096 Stream Processors, just like it’s more powerful brother – Fury X. How they managed to reduced the TDP from 275W to 175W, while retaining 1000 MHz boost clock is yet to be answered. What is known however is that R9 Nano is faster than Radeon R9 390X based on Hawaii GPU, and possibly even NVIDIA’s GTX 980.

Although GeForce GTX 980 has TDP of 165W, it was never available in such a small form factor (Mini ITX). The most powerful NVIDIA’s GPU offered in such format is GeForce GTX 970. That’s why GTX 970 is taken as a point of reference. Does it make sense? Of course, but I would still rather see how it does against GTX 980.

Apart from the miniature design, AMD Radeon R9 Nano could just be the proper response to NVIDIA’s GTX 980/970 series, only one year too late. Still, the Nano has 4096 Stream cores, twice as much as GTX 980, and possibly a lot of overclocking headroom. This card was downclocked/tunned for a reason: to show that AMD Radeon graphics cards can be as power efficient as Second Generation Maxwell.

Pretty much the only question that remains is: how much does it cost? Does comparing it to GTX 970 mean we are looking at similarly priced solution? This could just be the perfect cure to AMD’s dropping market share.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano angle AMD Radeon R9 Nano exploded

AMD R9 Nano Mini ITX build

Wait, did they just remove the sticker from Intel’s stock CPU cooler? Awkward.

by WhyCry

Previous Post
AMD Radeon R9 Nano confirmed to feature 4096 Stream Cores
Next Post
AMD launches Radeon R9 Nano

Back to Top ↑