Radeon HD 7000:  HD 7790 |  HD 7850 |  HD 7870 |  HD 7870 XT |  HD 7950 |  HD 7970 |  HD 7990 |  Radeon HD 8000:  HD 8750 |  HD 8770 |  HD 8850 |  HD 8870 |  HD 8950 |  HD 8970 |  HD 8990 
GeForce 600:  GTX 650 Ti Boost  |  GTX 660  |  GTX 660 Ti  |  GTX 670  |  GTX 680 |  GTX 690 |  Titan: GTX TITAN |  GeForce 700:  GTX 760  |  GTX 760 Ti  |  GTX 770  |  GTX 780 |  GTX 790 

February 10th, 2013

ASUS GeForce GTX Titan Has The Same Clocks As GTX 690 and 512-bit interface?

ASUS GeForce GTX Titan Has The Same Clocks As GTX 690 and 512 bit interface? geforce titan

Update

Please refer to the latest post for more updated news.

If you were concerned about a slow GeForce GTX Titan clock from earlier reports, then we have great news for you. An Australian shop has just revealed the final clocks of the GTX Titan.

An ASUS model, which is purportedly a reference one, will receive the same clocks as GeForce GTX 690. That is: 915 MHz base clock, 1019 MHz boost clock and 6008 MHz effective memory clock. This ends the discussion about the very slow core clock (732 MHz), which was mentioned by SweClockers two weeks ago. In my previous post, you can read about all previous rumors, some of them were not true, so I strongly recommend taking all the info about Titan with a grain of salt, including this very post too. This source however, is straight from retailer, a third one to be exact. So this is quite possibly the most accurate leak we can expect from an unofficial source before the launch. What this new source also reveals is that the GTX Titan will also feature a GPU Boost technology, probably the most recognized technology from Kepler architecture (confirming Keith’s prediction of Titan also featuring NVIDIA Boost Technology).

512-bit memory interface?

It’s worth noting, that the listing mentions a 512-bit memory interface. I cannot say why it’s wider, than said before, it may be just a typo. Or this can be a new leak, which would explain extraordinary performance of this card.

GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680Radeon HD 7970 GE
GPUGK1102x GK104GK104Tahiti XT2
Processing Units2688 307215362048
TMUs224256128128
ROPs48643232
Base Clock915 MHz915 MHz1006 MHz1000 MHz
Boost Clock1019 MHz1019 MHz1058 MHz1050 MHz
Memory Clock1502 MHz1502 MHz1502 MHz1500 MHz
Effective Memory Clock6008 MHz6008 MHz6008 MHz6000 MHz
Memory Size6 GB4 GB2 GB / 4GB3 GB / 6 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Memory Interface384-bit or 512-bit2 x 256-bit (512-bit)256-bit384-bit
Memory Bandwidth288 GB/s or
384 GB/s
384 GB/s192 GB/s288 GB/s
Power Connectors6 + 8-pin or
8 + 8-pin
8 + 8-pin6 + 6-pin6 + 8-pin
Power Draw250 W300 W195 W250 W
MSRP$899$999$499$499

What’s more, this listing also gives us confirmation that the GTX Titan will feature: two Dual-DVI’s and one mini-DisplayPort (it does not say it has a HDMI output). If you are one of those lucky guys living in Australia, then you should prepare to spend AUD 1599 for this purchase!

Many thanks to Skr13 for a tip
Previous listings:

ASUS GeForce GTX Titan Has The Same Clocks As GTX 690 and 512 bit interface? geforce titan

ASUS GeForce GTX Titan Has The Same Clocks As GTX 690 and 512 bit interface? geforce titan

Author: WhyCry  

Editor: Keith H.  

  • skr13

    The more interesting fact is the card will have 512-bit bus, resulting in 384 GB/s memory bandwidth, because 6GHz memory speed.
    Impressive :)

  • Pingback: Angebliches GTX Titan PCB, eine erste Analyse UPDATE: Und doch ein Fake - Seite 3

  • Pingback: nVidia GK110/Geforce 7xx/Geforce Titan [Speku-, News- & Diskussion] (1. Seite lesen!) - Seite 144

  • Jerome

    Memory widening is very expensive I doubt its 512-bit! The K20 that costs thousands has a 384 bit bus btw ! If all these rumors are true this thing should cost over 1k, since its will have more bandwidth and power over its K20 Tesla counterpart.

  • BestJinjo

    WhyCry you mixed up the lines for ROPs and TMUs.

    In Kepler (GK104), the ROPs are broken up as 4 ROPs per 1 SMX cluster. Since GK104 has 8 SMX clusters, you get 32 ROPs. Assuming a similar scenario for GK110, we’d get (2688 / 192) = 14 SMX clusters or 56 ROPs. The full GK110 has 15 SMX clusters and 6 memory controllers, with 64-bit per controller, for a total bandwidth of 384-bit. How can you have 512-bit when GK110 has a maximum of 384?

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/6446/nvidia-launches-tesla-k20-k20x-gk110-arrives-at-last

  • BestJinjo

    How? There are only 6 total memory controllers in GK110, each with 64-bit bus.

    “What we could say for sure is that GK110 was being built with 15 SMXes, 6 memory controllers, 1.5MB of L2 cache, and that it would offer double precision (FP64) performance that was 1/3rd its single precision (FP32 rate).”

  • Laughable Source

    Looks more like they directly copied 690 clock/memory interface specs.

  • http://videocardz.com/ WhyCry

    Thanks for noticing lol

  • BestJinjo

    The full GK110 has 6 memory controllers per this diagram:
    http://images.anandtech.com/doci/5840/GK110Block.png

    How did they get 512-bit bus? I think that retailer incorrectly copied the specs for GTX690 for the Titan or it’s a placeholder. Laughable Source beat me to it.

  • Jerome

    I remember the GTX 680 rumors about a 512 bit bus width , you remember?

  • Jerome

    Maybe Nvidia won the lottery and they do not give a damn about expensive GPU die space, so they decided to widen the front and sides memory bus for the heck of it!

  • Sauron

    Ghz looks like a pudle in front of turkish kangal Titan lol

  • BestJinjo

    I remember rumors of 768 CUDA core 580, 2304 CUDA core 680, etc. Always overhyped!

  • BestJinjo
  • http://videocardz.com/ WhyCry

    You are right. I didn’t spend much of the post about this, because I highly doubt that’s even possible. However, I wanted to note that there is such a ‘strange’ interface listed, so people would not be amazed how I missed that :)

  • http://videocardz.com/ WhyCry

    It’s a rumor center :) They could find that easily by digging through multiple sites as I, and members of this site, do.

  • MOSLER

    Why $1599? It supposed to be $899? Why they sell it with $700 (!) higher price? I wonder what is the prime cost?
    Such pricing policy can lead nVidia to the loss of the market share. They’re should spend less money for the promotion or even reduce staff to be able to reduce prices.

  • Jerome

    They wont lose market share because of TITAN dude lol seriously

  • Jerome

    The funny thing is if performance of this card in true minus the bus width what would be left for the GTX 780?? I mean a refresh cycle has never ever produce this kind of jump in performance before, So I assume that the 700 series will be based somewhat on the GK110 or some variants. It has too or else Titan will be the fastest card ever until the arrival of Maxwell!

  • Pingback: Geforce Titan: Angeblicher OpenCL-Benchmark aufgetaucht - Seite 2

  • BestJinjo

    Genius comment. Let me know the mathematics works out for you. $900 is 2.1x greater than $430 it costs for HD7970GE, for only 60% more performance. You can also just buy a $380 HD7970 and overclock it just the same. We would hope that a $900 card destroys a $380 one!

  • BestJinjo

    $1,599 sounds like a placeholder price. A lot of theses stores abroad sell at inflated prices compared to the US. Either way, the Titan’s purpose is not to sell millions of units. It’s a halo card to drum up interest for the NV brand by reclaiming the performance crown. It’s going to serve a similar purpose to the GTX690. Those are low volume seller cards to begin with.

  • Pingback: ظهور المواصفات الكامله لبطاقة NVIDIA GTX 780 TI (تسريب)

  • hey
  • BestJinjo

    I have a new alternative theory. Since NV is selling K20X parts for more than $3,000, wouldn’t it make sense for them to resell parts that couldn’t make Tesla instead of throwing them out? Then the chips that didn’t yield full 14 SMX clusters could be taken and overclocked. You’d end up with 13 SMX 2496 Titan but clocks at 1019mhz. This way you still have a very fast card and the TDP goes up to 250W. Since 732mhz + 2688 CUDA cores gives us a TDP of 235W, could 13 SMX @ 1019mhz at 250W TDP be a better trade-off for Nvidia to take? The projection for 1019mhz and 2688 CUDA cores at only a 15W TDP hit seems unrealistic, no?

  • BestJinjo

    Not impressed. Look at what HD7970 scores in the same benchmark.

    http://clbenchmark.com/compare.jsp?config_0=11905561&config_1=14470292

  • http://videocardz.com/ WhyCry

    It’s a good theory, however too many source have claimed it has 14 SMXs. I would rather stick to the story with 384-bit bus and lower sub-GHz clock. As for the power consumption I bet this is the very last of their concerns with this card. Whoever is going to buy one, doesn’t care about TDP.

  • BestJinjo

    It’s going to be on 20nm, 2880 CUDA cores with 1019mhz GPU clocks with Hot clocks to 2038mhz and 8Ghz of GDDR5 while using 185W of power. NV just purposely held that card back because there was no competition.

  • Pingback: [Rumor] Detail Terbaru Spesifikasi VGA NVIDIA GeForce Titan 780 | Jagat Review

  • Pingback: [Rumor] Detail Terbaru Spesifikasi VGA NVIDIA GeForce Titan 780 | Semua Pesan dari Indonesia

  • Pingback: Nueva filtración para la Asus Nvidia GeForce Titan, ahora con 512 bits de ancho de banda? « oZeros

  • Serjjj

    Guys and what is the 6GB memory, where they can do or stick)

  • BestJinjo

    DonanimHaber reports:

    384-bit bus, 288GB/sec memory bandwidth (or 6Ghz GDDR5)

    4.5 Tflops, 2688 CUDA cores (this suggest GPU clocks at around 840-850mhz, with a possible GPU boost to 900mhz?)

    http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.donanimhaber.com%2Fekran-karti%2Fhaberleri%2FOzel-Haber-Nvidia-GeForce-GTX-Titanin-resmiyet-kazanan-ozellikleri.htm&anno=2

  • BestJinjo

    6GB of VRAM is to flex your e-Peen after spending 9 bills :)

  • BestJinjo

    875mhz GPU clocks (Asus with 915mhz), 521mm2 chip. The initial boards will be made by EVGA and Asus only. Allegedly, there will be less than 10,000 Titans.

    http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2013/2/13/nvidia-geforce-titan-launches-february-18th2c-2013-loses-to-gtx-6902c-amd-hd-7990.aspx