Radeon HD 7000:  HD 7790 |  HD 7850 |  HD 7870 |  HD 7870 XT |  HD 7950 |  HD 7970 |  HD 7990 |  Radeon HD 8000:  HD 8750 |  HD 8770 |  HD 8850 |  HD 8870 |  HD 8950 |  HD 8970 |  HD 8990 
GeForce 600:  GTX 650 Ti Boost  |  GTX 660  |  GTX 660 Ti  |  GTX 670  |  GTX 680 |  GTX 690 |  Titan: GTX TITAN |  GeForce 700:  GTX 760  |  GTX 760 Ti  |  GTX 770  |  GTX 780 |  GTX 790 

October 6th, 2012

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti
Even though the official launch date of GeForce GTX 650 Ti is October 9th, there are few benchmarks results available on the web. However, there was still no full review posted anywhere, so if you are curious about the performance if this mid-range graphics card have a look below.

This is a full review posted by Korean website PlayWares. The review consist of synthetic benchmarks, game performance and power consumption.

In 3DMark11, GeForce GTX 650 Ti seems to be slightly faster than GTX 560 Ti. But even overclocked GPU clock of 1 GHz doesn’t make this card faster than Radeon HD 7850. In terms of average power consumption, GTX 650 Ti is quite near to Radeon’s power draw. The total system consumption is around 185W, while HD 7850′s 189W, so the difference is almost unnoticeable.

The overall performance indicates that GeForce GTX 650 Ti is 28% slower than Radeon HD 7850 in 1920×1080 resolution, whereas in 1680×1050 the difference is 27%. Overclocking can give additional 7% speed but that’s still not enough to fight against Radeon HD 7850. However, this card clocked at 1GHz is slightly faster than GTX 560.

The leaking site does not mention official TDP or the exact model of tested card. The official specification is already know and it is confirmed by GPU-Z screenshot from this review. The GTX 650 Ti would feature 768 CUDA cores and 16 ROPs (the same number of ROPs as GTX 650, but lesser than GTx 660). The GPU is clocked at 928 MHz by default, while the memory is clocked at 5.4 GHz. Card will arrive with two memory configurations — 1GB or 2GB of GDDR5 memory, however it will be offering only 128-bit interface.

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

3Dmark11 Performance

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Game performance

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Relative performance

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Overall score (Performance and TDP combined)
Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Detailed results

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti Full GeForce GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out geforce gtx 650ti

Many thanks to John Clark for a tip

  • Nvidia ggce

    Cut the prices oF hd 7700 series and hd 7850 losers…

  • nvidia ggce

    128 bit card touching the performance of hd 7850 and gtx 560ti amazing……hd 7700 series your ass is finally kicked ….kepler dominance is completed

  • Pingback: Nvidia Geforce: Kepler Discussion Thread - Page 19

  • BestJinjo

    “Touching the performance” of HD7850, while losing by 28% in games? That’s like saying HD7950 is touching the performance of GTX680 or GTX660Ti is touching the performance of HD7970 Ghz edition using your fanboy math.

    You said “HD7700 series your ass is finally kicked?” HD7750/7770 series had no real (28nm) competition from NV since mid-February 2012. Wow, finally in mid-October, NV decided to show up but there is a small detail you missed. A $119 HD7770 does not compete with a GTX650Ti, rumored at $149, when HD7850 is $159 now. Thanks for the laughs. You would do well during the 2nd US presidential debate.

    Is it great for consumers that GTX650 Ti is offering more choice? Yes, but your statements are too fanboish about anything NV does to take seriously.

    Not sure how companies reducing prices is them being losers since as a consumer I love it when companies reduce prices. I guess NV fanboys love paying high prices and don’t want NV to drop prices to offer them more performance for their dollar spent. Noted. I am glad many other NV owners on this site disagree with you. You should pass this on to JHH so next round he can withhold the real GTX780 and sell you a mid-range GTX760Ti as a re-badged GTX780 for $499. I heard you’ll love it since you hate it when NV drops prices as it means they would also losers in your eyes.

  • ZoSo

    Well I didn’t delete anything, I have no idea why your comment wasn’t posted or was removed. Did come from this mod :D

  • ZoSo

    Well I didn’t delete anything, I have no idea why your comment wasn’t posted or was removed. Didn’t come from this mod :D

  • ZoSo

    comment is still here, not sure why you thought it was deleted.

  • Syed Ahmed

    idk know when i comment here and i check after 15mins its says no comments so i thought it was deleted that why i type again

  • Raghar

    A simple survey of newegg’s prices says 2GB version should be under 160 to be competitive. Lack of 192-bit interface is bit problem, I’d rather have DDR5-4000 than DDR5-5400, but it’s between 7770 GHz edition and 7850, which gives it proper place on the market. It’s also nice replacement of GTX 560. For how much was GTX 560 at the beginning of the year?

    Cheapest 7850 with 2 GB of memory is $184.99. Paying for 1 GB AMD card is waste of money, considering Dishonored needs 756 MB RAM. Getting 2 GB GT 640 would be smarter idea than paying for 7850 1 GB, it’s half price, and there is passively cooled, which means no noise and much less cleaning.

  • zeropercenthotgas

    “Getting 2 GB GT 640 would be smarter idea than paying for 7850 1 GB,” ?????? I am seriously hoping thats a typo. Everyone knows that GT 640 gets blown out of the water by HD 7750.

    GTX 650 2 gb won’t mean anything, unless the game can use that much and most games don’t. Even then, the perfomance gap is probably too large for GTX 650 Ti to catch up.

  • zeropercenthotgas

    128 bit and 6 months late. I don’t know what chart you are reading but HD 7850 is blowing GTX 650 TI out of the water. Besides, the leaked news all pointed to GTX 660Ti/ Gtx 660 being faster than the cards in their targeted market. But, look at how the real world usage turned out. The truth isn’t too rosy green troll

    Also Admin, you might wanna kick this guy. Hes know for trolling and spamming on several other sites. Just letting you know before this gets out of hand :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/quinnfitz Quinn FitzGerald

    so get a 7770 or older gen card?

  • skr13

    HI, you registered already in forum ? I don’t gonna post here so frequently, but you can find me over there :)

  • Raghar

    Not, it’s not a typo. You save money, and you know you’d be able to play certain games at low settings. With 7850 you are in risk that 1.5 years later, you would hit that 1 GB limit. Well, 7850 might be massively faster than GT 640, but the speed becomes irrelevant when the player would be forced to use “low/medium” textures to be able to play the game at all. Basically an user would save 20 bucks for 1 GB card, but it would come back and bite him two years later.

    Strangely 2GB DDR5 7770 are next to nonexistent, the same can be said about 7750. 2GB DD3 AMD cards are on the market, however difference in speed would be the same as between GT 640 and GTX 650, which means more reliable drivers, better high res videos, CUDA, and Linux support would make NVidia better choice. Strategy pay 89 bucks now, then grab something later is perfectly viable, at least GT 640 can be used as a CUDA device, and has tinny power consumption which allows it to be a secondary card on the system.

  • common sense

    you serious ??? GT 640 can’t keep up even with GTS 450, good luck with saving these 20 bucks

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gt-640-review,3214-4.html

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gt-640-review,3214-9.html

  • Raghar

    The cheapest 2GB card with DDR5 is GIGABYTE GTX 650 2GB. The cheapest card with passive cooling and 2+GB RAM is Zotac GT 640. If you seen any GTX 450 with 2GB DDR5, show it, otherwise current situation is as I wrote. There is nothing available with 2GB DDR5 for the low end of market, and 1GB versions would start hitting theirs limits relatively soon (1-2 years)*1. If you want to grab a card for only one two years do so, but you can upgrade then use low end card like GT 640 in secondary computer for watching anime, a high res video loves these 2 GB RAM (especially with filtering), CUDA*2 (or OpenCL) also NEEDS a lot of RAM. Thus some low end cards does have some advantages.

    Reasonable AMD 2GB cards starts at 180 $.

    *1 This reminds me about my experience with 5700, people with X1950 could play games at full speed in high settings, then developers switched. I was able to play games, people with X1950 don’t.
    *2 CUDA programs prefers secondary card, because watchdog can reset device when card is connected to monitor. (We are generating a new map in CUDA, it would be just a 15 seconds instead of 3 minutes… 5 second timeout -> driver not responding error -> watchdog resets device -> program crashed/froze.) Generally, it’s better to have faster card than two cards, but when user have a card to spare…

  • common sense

    well there are few options for 2 GB versions (prices from newegg)

    - Nvidia GT 640 2GB DDR3 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125433
    $100
    - Nvidia GTS 450 2GB DDR3 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127605
    $100 (there is only DDR3 version)
    - AMD 7750 2GB DDR3 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161427&Tpk=7750%202GB
    $105
    - And there is GTX 550 Ti with 2GB DDR5 on sale http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130744
    $110
    and price go up
    - Nvidia GTX 650 2GB DDR5 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125444
    $140
    - AMD 7770 2GB DDR5 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121642
    $160

    So that’s how prices looks like for 2GB version. I don’t think you can future proof card for $100,
    and in 2 years you probably end up looking for another one.

  • Pingback: gtx 650 ti review

  • zeropercenthotgas

    True, but Nvidia drivers is not more realiable than AMD. Same could be said about AMD. I hear people spin this all the time and there is no basis to it. BS on that

    Opengl/HSA vs CUDA take your pick. We know and have seen what AMD is pushing it to do. Nvidia vs. AMD+ rest of ARMy. And, why would you buy a 80 dollar card to do CUDA/Opengl anyways???

    We all know next gen console is mostly AMD and radeon hd 7XXX derivative. Radeon hd 7XXX eat kepler for breakfast in compute and ill be damned if AMD doesn’t push that. Not sure about GT 640 vs 7750 compute, we do know that 7850 is comparble to GTX 680 compute, I think?

    There are too many 1 gb cards in the world. It will be stupid for game makers to make a game only for 1gb+ cards in the forseeable future. GT 640 is so slow, even if Radeon hd 7850 is brought down due to not enough memory, you are still gonna get higher FPS on the lower setting. AND GUESS WHAT, HD 7850 gonna prolly cost the same as GT 640 now by the time that happends. You just can’t fix a slow core by tossing more memory at it, low setting may even be too much for GT 640 in the future.

    AMD linux support is better than Nvidia I believe.

    You can grab a radeon hd 7850(Which is a really good OCer can get near GTX 580) or even 7770/7750 and play games on high setting(or high med for the 7XXX) for 3 years or you can slog through games on low setting(maybe medium setting) with GT 640 for 3 years.

    Buying a GT 640 2gb is the worst overpriced decision ever.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • BestJinjo

    HD7770 isn’t great for gaming. I think you should get a used HD6950 2GB, especially if it’s unlocked. Gives you HD6970 level of performance. These cards should be easy to find at $150 or below. Alternatively, just wait for a deal on a 7850 2GB card by Black Friday for $150. It’s going to come up.

  • BestJinjo

    Oh ya, sorry, I gotta do that :) I’ll find you there soon.

  • Keicie

    if your doing your hunting on black friday it might as well be geforce 660/660ti/680 or Radeon 7850/78707950
    and dont buy older cards they consume too much power for the slight performance increase. choose 2gb cards if you have 1080p or higher resolution monitor or plan to upgrade later. if not stick to 1gb to save money. the 7770 is fine specially if you have crossfire board, having dual 7770′s can match 7950 performance at a much cheaper price, much cheaper if you plan to do it later…

  • Keicie

    no dude gpu memory does not dictate performance in fact in most cases bigger memory impact makes some games slightly slower. the 640 2gb cant even match a 7750 1gb much less a 7850 of thrice the performance… but if this 650ti is priced accordingly (say $129) it will be a much better option than a 7770. and just like any hobby there is always the next best thing for just a little more money, in this case its the 7850 then the 660 then 7870 then the 660 and so on…