GTX 670 need to drop $20 at least. And GTX 680 $30.
How much will cost 7950?

7950 Boost Edition will now cost $300 (234 EUR) while the ordinary AMD Radeon HD 7950 will set you back $290 (227 EUR).
Softpedia

Also ”
Let’s don’t forget” is “Let’s not forget” :p

This is why we need both AMD and NV to be competitive in the GPU market. The winner is the consumer!

They will be. We are not going back to $299 / $369 price levels from AMD. AMD is going to launch HD8000 series first and price them at $449 / $549. That’s what ATI did. When AMD sold cards at a loss since HD4800 series, they were losing money. Consumers still bought NV cards despite AMD offering superior price/performance. Thus, AMD is done with that strategy. They will lower prices ONLY if NV brings out a much faster product in GTX700 OR if NV launches very closely to HD8000 series. If NV is again 3-8 months late with its product line roll-out, AMD will take full advantage of lack of competition and price HD8950/8970 high again. It makes sense since NV has been doing this for years and we AMD spoiled us with $269 5850….and $299 4870.

According to [H] review the msrp of 650gtx will be $110

also forget 300usd = 230 eur, we get in europe 1eur:1usd …

Now here’s one who understands! Exactly, in Eu the market is such a s*** they don’t change the value (like they should), instead they just change the currency from USD to Euro…
In my country, the prices of 7000 series are still the same from the day they got released (HD 7870 = 340eu). So let’s say i’m trying to find a card at a very low price, i’m forced to search it in germany, because the price there is a little more cheap.

No, the performance didn’t really justify it. GTX260 was $399 and was slower than HD4870 for $299. HD4850 was completely unbeaten until NV countered it with 9800GTX+ (but even that card was inferior). Plus that entire line of NV cards offered worse power consumption too. NV had to launch GTX260 216 to match 4870′s speed but that was way later. Then HD4890 delivered GTX280 level of performance for $269 and 280 was $649 at launch less than a year before. When 260 216 was going for $175-180, 4890 was going for $190-200 and destroyed the 260 216. NV continued to charge high prices most of that generation. Looking back at games now even 285 doesn’t win against 4890, which means all that additional $ spent on the 285 was wasted (would have been better off buying a 4890 and using the savings for a future GPU upgrade such as GTX470/480/5800 series).

Then you have a situation such as HD5850/5870 where they delivered amazing performance 6 months before 470/480 launched. Again AMD went uncontested for full 6 months. Then you have HD6950 unlocked which pretty much made 580 look crazy overpriced. You could have bought almost 2 6950s unlocked for the price of 1 580.

How exactly did NV make AMD look “bad” this generation? NV lost both the price/performance and single-GPU performance all in 1 round and allowed AMD to raise prices with no consequences. If anything, NV blew this generation completely. Normally, AMD has to compete at lower price levels because NV has such a strong line-up. This round NV was late 3 months with flagship cards and 6-8 months late with <$300 mid-range and low-end desktop GPUs. That's a very poor showing from NV. All that talk of GK110 launching 'soon' was just rumors and now we are looking at 2013 at best. The only thing that saved NV's face is AMD's terrible drivers until Cats 12.7 and BF3.

I am hoping NV can come back strong with GTX780 or Maxwell because the current iteration of Kepler is weak. If I am going to pay NV's pricing premium, their cards better be faster and this round they are not.

for nv sake it better be

Are you living in the past? With the new drivers amd 7970 and 680 are very close. The gtx 670 still faster than 7950. In my country I can get a aftermarket cooler 7970 at 670 prices (400euros) while a stock 680 costs 500+