Radeon HD 7000:  HD 7790 |  HD 7850 |  HD 7870 |  HD 7870 XT |  HD 7950 |  HD 7970 |  HD 7990 |  Radeon HD 8000:  HD 8750 |  HD 8770 |  HD 8850 |  HD 8870 |  HD 8950 |  HD 8970 |  HD 8990 
GeForce 600:  GTX 650 Ti Boost  |  GTX 660  |  GTX 660 Ti  |  GTX 670  |  GTX 680 |  GTX 690 |  Titan: GTX TITAN |  GeForce 700:  GTX 760  |  GTX 760 Ti  |  GTX 770  |  GTX 780 |  GTX 790 

July 29th, 2012

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Also in 256-bit Version

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Also in 256 bit Version geforce gtx 660ti geforce gtx 660
Chinese website redquasar has leaked some interesting bit of information regarding a 256-bit version of GeForce GTX 660 Ti.

Apparently, there are two models of GTX 660 Ti, which differ in memory bus width and CUDA cores count. The one, which specifications were leaked few days ago, has 1344 CUDA cores and 192-bit interface. However, this model cannot beat the Radeon HD 7870, so NVIDIA came up with a new version with 256-bit instead, but also a castrated amount of cores – 1152.

The leaker says that this is a non-public version of the GTX 660 Ti, which is equipped with two 6-pin power connectors, while the 192-bit version would have only one. Card has a clocks of 980/1123/6000 MHz for base, boost and effective memory respectively. According to the source, card can reach a score of 2700 points in 3DMark11 Extreme Preset. That’s a score of Radeon HD 7970. What is more, it’s only 8% worse than GTX 670. Card can easily be overclocked to 1.2 GHz, just like other GK104 GPUs. Card is a dual-slot, short PCB model with two DVI’s, DP and a HDMI output.

NVIDIA is struggling whether to release a 192-bit version which will not beat HD 7870, or 256-bit model which will affect the sales of GTX 670. Author of the post is expected to provide a GPU-Z screen-shot, so we might verify this information.

In my opinion, this is actually the GTX 660 Ti graphics card, while a 192-bit model is a non-Ti. This would make sense, unless NVIDIA slightly decreases the clocks of Ti model, because it’s too close to GTX 670. We will see if those specs are true in a short while.

You can read the source page, it’s partially in English.

UPDATE:
Head on here for more information about a non-Ti variant.

 

GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 670
GPU28nm Kepler GK10428nm Kepler GK104
CUDA Cores1152 (?)1344
Base clock980915 MHz
Boost Clock1032980 MHz
Memory Interface256-bit256-bit
Memory Bandwith192.2 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Memory Size2048 MB2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Effective Memory Clock6008 MHz6008 MHz
TDP150 W170 W
3DMark11 X Score~2700~2900

Thanks Skr13 for a tip.

  • skr13

    Yeah, good translation ;) I´m always ready to help Videocardz.

    Anyway, that´s the card i´m waiting for, and if do 2700 in 3d mark preset, will be a hell of a card, and with lower TDP than AMD rivals. Even GTX660 non Ti with 2K score is on pair with HD7950 and sure reaches GTX580 with little OC.
    Hope to see a GPU-Z print to prove it…

  • http://videocardz.com/ VideoCardz.com

    The funny thing is that earlier rumors were more solid than those, now we are talking about 3 cards with completely different specs – GK106, GK104 192-bit and GK104 256-bit – all GTX 660.

  • BestJinjo

    The 256-bit model looks good. Although 3dMark11 is the most worthless benchmark this generation. It actually has nothing to do with how the modern GPUs stack up in real world gaming performance. I want to see if that 144GB/sec 192-bit card gets crippled in real world gaming 1080P with 8AA or with Super-Sampling in older/less intensive games where it can be turned on (Portal 2). I bet it will.

    TechSpot just reviewed HD7970 at 1080mhz, 1200mhz and 1260mhz. GTX680 was faster than the 1080mhz 7970 in 3dMark11 but lost in every gaming benchmark except for Max Payne 3.
    http://www.techspot.com/review/555-gigabyte-radeon-hd-7970-soc/

    3DMark11 =! real world gaming performance.

    Maybe the 1344 / 192-bit model will be GTX660, while the 1152 / 256-bit model will be GTX660Ti.

  • Andy

    Hmm. Is it me or does the fan on that thing look worryingly like the helicopter impersonating GTX 470 fan?

  • skr13

    UPDATE: GTX 660 non-TI, 980MHZ, 6008MHZ, 1152 Cuda Cores, 24 ROPS. 192-bit, 1536GB Vram.
    I´m really excited with all new rumors every day, every hour ;)

  • Jerome

    Absolutely 3D Mark is nothing more than an Nvidia optimized bench nothing more.

  • http://videocardz.com/ VideoCardz.com

    Thanks :)

  • http://videocardz.com/ VideoCardz.com

    You are absolutely right, but this was the only performance indicator he mentioned.

  • http://videocardz.com/ VideoCardz.com

    But what is different? A performance you mentioned is exactly what the post says :)

  • FYFI_13

    GTX660Ti is 10% above (faster>>>) than GTX670? How come?

  • SalemSwift

    I’m sure he means reference 660 Ti is 10% slower than reference 670, thereby being inline with AMD’s 7950.