Radeon HD 7000:  HD 7790 |  HD 7850 |  HD 7870 |  HD 7870 XT |  HD 7950 |  HD 7970 |  HD 7990 |  Radeon HD 8000:  HD 8750 |  HD 8770 |  HD 8850 |  HD 8870 |  HD 8950 |  HD 8970 |  HD 8990 
GeForce 600:  GTX 650 Ti Boost  |  GTX 660  |  GTX 660 Ti  |  GTX 670  |  GTX 680 |  GTX 690 |  Titan: GTX TITAN |  GeForce 700:  GTX 760  |  GTX 760 Ti  |  GTX 770  |  GTX 780 |  GTX 790 

June 2nd, 2012

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz
It’s been a while since we heard anything about Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition, but thanks to Korean website we have a first look at this new model of Radeon HD 7000 Series. New variant is featuring a core clock of 1075 MHz. First benchmarks suggest that it’s 7% faster than 925MHz model, but it’s quite noisy and power hungry.

This article is based on a review by Cooln.kr, which you can read here.

Card is featuring increased clocks on both core and memory. GPU is now clocked at 1075 MHz (16% more) and memory is set to 1500 MHz (9% more). Since clocks are connected to computing power, card is now faster in pixel and texture fillrate, also memory bandwidth is now higher by 24 GB/s. Since the core is the same as on default model rest of the specs are not changed. According to the source, there is absolutely no change to the design and PCB of the Radeon HD 7970.

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Pictures

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz

GPU ComparisonAMD Radeon HD 7970
GHz Edition
AMD Radeon HD 7970NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Core Clock:1075 MHz925 MHz1006/1059 MHz
Memory Clock:1500 MHz1375 MHz1502 MHz
Effective Memory Clock:6000 MHz5500 MHz6008 MHz
Stream Processors:204820481536
Texture Units:128128128
Raster Operating Units:323232
Memory Interface:384-bit384-bit256-bit
Memory Size:3096 MB3096 MB2048 MB
Pixel Fillrate:34.4 GP/s29.6 GP/s32.2 GP/s
Texture Fillrate:137.6 GT/s118. GT/s128.8 GT/s
Memory Bandwidth:288 GB/s264 GB/s192.3 GB/s
TDP:250 W (measured ~310W)250 W195 W

Although photos indicate that this is an engineering sample NOT to be tested, it was put through various benchmarks anyway, with the following testing rig:

  • Intel Core i5 3770K @ 4.5GHz
  • GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UD3H
  • 8GB DDR3 RAM @ 2133 MHz

Here is how this new variant competes with a standard version of HD 7970 and GeForce GTX 680.

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz

According to this data, new version is faster by 7% than earlier model. The HD 7970 GHz Edition offers a performance of GeForce GTX 680. When we look at other benchmarks then you will notice that GHz Edition offers just the performance of standard version with the same clocks. What is interesting though, is the fact that putting a standard version through 3DMark11 benchmark with a clocks of GHz Edition give better results than GHz Edition itself. It’s hard to understand the cause, but it looks like some dynamic clocks issue, which are oscillating during the test, rather than being more stable (driver issue).

New GHz Edition offers slightly lower power consumption than comparable stock model (~10 Watts less), but it’s still higher than NVIDIA’s GTX 680 TDP. Card is also hotter by 1 degree C in comparison to old 7970 model. Therefore, reviewers do not recommend buying this card. It’s quite easy to predict that it will be more expensive, while offering nothing in return. Since it offers performance of GTX 680 but more noise and power consumption it has to be cheaper than NVIDIA’s card, otherwise, there’s no need to bother about it. But as mentioned earlier, this is only an engineering sample, so those benchmarks may not indicate actual performance.

Cooln.kr did not reveal when will this model be released, but it looks like we may expect it at Computex, or in late June.

Benchmarks

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz

Overclocking

Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Detailed and Tested radeon 7970 ghz

  • bildelberg group

    how much is it in $ ?

  • http://videocardz.com/ VideoCardz.com

    Actual price is not yet revealed. But it shouldn’t be higher than GTX 680′s – $500.

  • BestJinjo

    HD7970 is AMD’s Fermi at those clock and voltages. AMD buyers were very critical of the poor power consumption and noise levels for GTX480 but yet that card was a good 20% faster than HD5870 and to this day can still play modern DX11 games due to its potent tessellation performance and 1.5GB of VRAM. Ironically, these same complaints are no longer voiced against HD7970. What happened?

    GTX670 = 232W
    GTX680 = 261W
    HD7970 Ghz ~ GTX680 performance = 312W

    Load noise levels
    GTX670 = 50.2 dB
    GTX680 = 50.6 dB
    HD7970 Ghz = 56.8 dB

    One would have thought that the node process will have improved by now and as a result AMD would be able to ship card clocked > 1 Ghz at much lower voltages, thus keeping power consumption the same, if not better. Perhaps something is wrong with this engineering sample as it needs 1.256V to achieve 1075mhz and overclocking is not any better than the current 7970 revision/stepping.

  • globalresearch.ca

    Having Corsair Obsidian 550D quiet case + this card the sound shouldn’t be a problem.

  • BestJinjo

    The problem with this card isn’t just noise. It costs as much as a GTX680 and consumes more power while not being any faster. There are plenty of factory preoverclocked and quiet 680s too. I think HD7970 only makes sense for a non-reference design card. Your case might help, but it’s the 3rd loudest videocard on air of all time. Cooling it at 1200mhz on reference cooler is asking to introduce a jet engine into your case!

  • shark975

    This just bringing 7970 more in line with Nvidia’s clock cheating AKA boost. It doesnt get all the way there but it closes the gap. Prior you had 925 mhz 7970 competing with 1058 mhz 680 which then boosted even further (and you can bet review sites get cherry picked high boosting chips compared to what consumers will get too). Hardly a fair fight. Fact is when max overclocked usually 7970 is faster than 680, but everybody thinks the 680 is faster, partly because of boost. This will help change that misconception.

    It also doesn’t “cost just as much as 680″. Last I looked there were 7970 going on newegg for as little as $425 at times after rebate, while 680 if you can even find one is often $550+ (at least $500) with 1GB less of RAm which is a big factor in a high end card. All for a card that is slower than the 7970. I hope consumers wake up and stop blindly buying Nvidia. More like the 7970 costs as much as a 670 while being faster.

    680 sounds like a jet engine as well, Nvidia’s usual overclock problems (where often even Nvidia factory overclocked cards dont work at their rated speeds, a problem I’ve never heard occur with AMD, LOL BF3 solution was “turn all Nvidia cards down to stock even if factory overclocked”) and there’s Nvidia’s typical terrible drivers. Nvidia needs to put out cards that can actually run as fast as AMD’s so they can stop cutting corners and cheating in drivers which leads to all these problems you see with Nvidia cards on forums.

  • shark975

    OH and BTW this sites benches seem a little Nvidia favorable. Guessing sites like Anandtech will show benches more favorable to 7970.

    Bottom line AMD has the faster card than Nvidia, Nvidia is falling behind now with each gen.

  • shark975

    Put it another way, I just added up all the benchmarks and 7970 ghz beats 670 in 14 of them, and loses to 670 in 6.

    But also, in five of the tests, 670 beats 7970, but loses to 7970 ghz edition. So 670 vs 7970, 670 wins 11 and loses 9. Vs ghz edition, it wins 6 and loses 14. So consumer PERCEPTION will go from “7970 is slower than 670″ to “7970 is faster than 670″ which is all that matters.

    So yeah, ghz edition will change consumer perception a lot. And nobody cares about your heat/noise BS, which it’s probably just an early card anyway. Wasn’t Fermi the hottest most inefficient card on the planet? And nobody cared about that.

  • BestJinjo

    Not sure what benchmarks you are looking at. Even at Anandtech, GTX680 handily beat the 7970. GTX670 beats HD7950 by 25-30% in modern games, while GTX680 beats HD7970 by 7-10% on average.

    Last 3 generations, AMD wasn’t even in the running for performance. HD4870 only competed with GTX260 216, HD4890 with GTX275, HD5870 was 20% slower than GTX480 (and in today’s games even loses to the GTX470 since it has poor tessellation performance), while GTX570 = HD6970.

    It’s simply not true that NV is falling behind in each generation when NV had the fastest single GPU since G80 and not since X1900XT/X1950XT series has AMD/ATI “won” any generation at all.

    Also, the whole argument for AMD or NV “favoured” games is pointless and has been beaten to death. As a gamer, you pick up new games to play. Do you not buy games that run faster on NV GPUs? That’s now how most gamers shop for a new card. They buy the card that runs the fastest in the majority of the games they play. If 90% of games run fastest on AMD< NV or 3dFX or Matrox graphics, that's the card most people would be buying. Game performance can be improved with drivers and optimizations, but in the end, if you look at the benchmarks in modern games, NV's cards perform faster in Dirt Showdown, SKYRIM, BF3, Max Payne 3. It's not about if those games are "NV favoured" or not. If you want a new GPU, you'll buy one the fastest in modern games unless you just hate NV.

  • BestJinjo

    Fermi (470/480/570/580) can still play modern games such as Batman AC, while HD5870 is a slideshow.

    You could have purchased a $250 GTX480 and an after market cooler and it would mop the floor with the 5870 in latest titles, have 1.5GB of VRAM. HD5870 1GB is paper weight today for a lot of games. GTX480 was hot sure, but the hardware was forwards looking. After all, Kepler is just a massaged Fermi. It’s essentially Fermi and on 28nm it’s destroying HD7970 with just 192GB/sec memory bandwidth and 1536SPs, while HD7970 needs 264GB/sec bandwidth and 2048 to keep up.

    Also, in the case of HD7970, why in the world would you buy a GPU that uses more power and can’t beat a GPU that’s more efficient? People didn’t care as much for 480′s power consumption because it was faster, while GTX470 cost less than 5870 and overclocked to surpass 480.

    GTX480 was 20% faster than HD5870. HD7970 is slower than GTX680 while GTX670 = HD7970 for $100 less. For these reasons, HD7970 simply makes no sense. It’s one thing to have worse power consumption and more performance but HD7970 isn’t faster, costs more than 670, is slower than 680 and consumes 100W more power once it’s overclocked to match an overclocked 680.

    Also, no amount of overclocking on the 7970 will allow it to catch up in modern games. It only looks good when testing in older games such as AvP, Metro 2033 or Crysis 1. It basically loses in the majority of modern games.

  • BestJinjo

    Everybody thinks GTX680 is faster because it is. The $425 7970′s on Newegg are not very good. They have reference designed jet engine coolers. The cheapest 7970 worth buying is usually $460-475 and those cards have coil whine (Sapphire Dual-X, HIS ICEq). The only HD7970 worth buying with premium components is the Asus DCUII and it’s $500, MSI Lightning = $550. All the other ones have crappy coolers, coil whine lottery, etc.

    Should be we testing GTX580 at 880mhz clocks because HD6970 runs at 880mhz? Is Intel’s Turbo Boost cheating as well? Dude, I don’t really care if you buy an HD7970. GTX680 is faster with no manual overclocking — in modern games (In fact even GTX670 is):

    BF3 –
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5818/nvidia-geforce-gtx-670-review-feat-evga/11

    MP3 –
    http://www.techspot.com/review/537-max-payne-3-performance/page4.html

    If and when AMD launches HD7970 at 1070-1100mhz from the factory with a quiet after market cooler, then they’ll regain their competitiveness.

    For now GTX670 Windforce 3X and Asus DCU GTX670 offer faster performance out of the box, have far quieter coolers and cost $60-100 less, without any of the annoying coil wine. Also, you failed to consider that some people may spend $50-60 from HD7870 and get a much faster GTX670 but not many people will up their budget from $350 to $500 that is necessary for the HD7970.

    NV has the best bang for the buck high-end card in the 670 this round. HD7850 has the $250-260 price level won. HD7870 is not worth buying and HD7950 is completely overpriced. HD7750/7770 are turds and gamers would be better off getting 6850/6870.

    You may want to revisit reviews since at 1080P GTX670 = HD7970:

    http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/2012/test-nvidia-geforce-gtx-670/4/

    At 2560×1600, a single 7970/680 aren’t fast enough for modern games, so it’s a moot point.