March 20th, 2012
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Performance Comparison

We’ve made a comparison out of the Tom’s Hardware leaked charts. Curiosity took us to some conclusions.
GeForce GTX 680 is on average 15% faster than Radeon HD 7970. It is also faster than GeForce GTX 580 by 30%. It has a performance comparable to Radeon HD 6990 (98% of its performance). GeForce GTX 680 is slower than GTX 590 by 9%.
GeForce GTX 680 seems to be slower than Radeon HD 7970 in Metro 2033. In Dirt 3 GTX 680 has much better performance than any AMD product. Other tests suggest that GTX 680 is a better solution if you are planning to upgrade your graphics card in a near future. Fudzilla reported today that GTX 680 may be available from $499. Multiple pages are now listing new GTX model in a price $550-580.
Here is the full detailed comparison in separate tables for three resolutions 2560×1600/1920×1080/1680×1050:
2560×1600
| GeForce GTX 680 Performance [2560x1600] vs | HD 7970 | HD 6990 | GTX 590 | GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 0xAA] | 103% | 77% | 94% | 142% |
| Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 4xAA] | 105% | 90% | 88% | 136% |
| Crysis 2 [DirectX 9] | 95% | 85% | 81% | 123% |
| Crysis 2 [DirectX 11] | 117% | 123% | 89% | 134% |
| Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [High Preset] | 106% | 97% | 88% | 136% |
| Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [Ultra Preset] | 106% | 90% | 84% | 130% |
| videocardz.com | ||||
| Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [0xAA] | 133% | 100% | 101% | 150% |
| Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [4xAA] | 118% | 86% | 91% | 141% |
| Metro 2033 [AAA] | 99% | 77% | 93% | 129% |
| Metro 2033 [4xAA] | 93% | 67% | 83% | 120% |
| World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 0xAA] | 116% | 115% | 95% | 132% |
| World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 8xAA] | 133% | 108% | 81% | 124% |
| AVERAGE | 110% | 93% | 89% | 133% |
1920×1080
| GeForce GTX 680 Performance [1920x1080] vs | HD 7970 | HD 6990 | GTX 590 | GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Extreme Preset | 116% | 96% | 91% | 133% |
| Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 0xAA] | 115% | 87% | 104% | 152% |
| Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 4xAA] | 113% | 93% | 93% | 139% |
| Crysis 2 [DirectX 9] | 104% | 97% | 95% | 123% |
| Crysis 2 [DirectX 11] | 125% | 126% | 95% | 139% |
| Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [High Preset] | 107% | 110% | 87% | 127% |
| Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [Ultra Preset] | 112% | 108% | 86% | 128% |
| videocardz.com | ||||
| Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [0xAA] | 141% | 105% | 100% | 147% |
| Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [8xAA] | 122% | 90% | 91% | 133% |
| Metro 2033 [AAA] | 88% | 74% | 86% | 118% |
| Metro 2033 [4xAA] | 104% | 88% | 98% | 133% |
| World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 0xAA] | 119% | 127% | 99% | 107% |
| World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 8xAA] | 136% | 115% | 91% | 124% |
| HAWK X [8xAA, Tessellation Enabled] | 115% | 83% | 72% | 101% |
| HAWK X [8xAA, Tessellation Disabled] | 140% | 90% | 83% | 107% |
| AVERAGE | 117% | 99% | 91% | 127% |
1680×1050
| GeForce GTX 680 Performance [1680x1050] vs | HD 7970 | HD 6990 | GTX 590 | GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 0xAA] | 118% | 88% | 105% | 153% |
| Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 4xAA] | 115% | 95% | 94% | 139% |
| Crysis 2 [DirectX 9] | 103% | 99% | 98% | 112% |
| Crysis 2 [DirectX 11] | 125% | 125% | 95% | 138% |
| Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [High Preset] | 113% | 122% | 94% | 129% |
| Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [Ultra Preset] | 114% | 114% | 88% | 123% |
| videocardz.com | ||||
| Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [0xAA] | 142% | 106% | 102% | 146% |
| Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [4xAA] | 127% | 89% | 91% | 134% |
| Metro 2033 [AAA] | 105% | 93% | 96% | 131% |
| Metro 2033 [4xAA] | 93% | 75% | 86% | 129% |
| World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 0xAA] | 109% | 120% | 97% | 104% |
| World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 8xAA] | 135% | 116% | 91% | 122% |
| AVERAGE | 117% | 104% | 95% | 130% |




Pingback: NVIDIA Kepler (GTX 600) | Discussion Thread - Page 22
Pingback: NVIDIA Kepler GeForce 600 Series | News/Discussion Thread - Page 2