Radeon HD 7000:  HD 7790 |  HD 7850 |  HD 7870 |  HD 7870 XT |  HD 7950 |  HD 7970 |  HD 7990 |  Radeon HD 8000:  HD 8750 |  HD 8770 |  HD 8850 |  HD 8870 |  HD 8950 |  HD 8970 |  HD 8990 
GeForce 600:  GTX 650 Ti Boost  |  GTX 660  |  GTX 660 Ti  |  GTX 670  |  GTX 680 |  GTX 690 |  Titan: GTX TITAN |  GeForce 700:  GTX 760  |  GTX 760 Ti  |  GTX 770  |  GTX 780 |  GTX 790 

March 20th, 2012

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Performance Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Performance Comparison geforce gtx 680
We’ve made a comparison out of the Tom’s Hardware leaked charts. Curiosity took us to some conclusions.

GeForce GTX 680 is on average 15% faster than Radeon HD 7970. It is also faster than GeForce GTX 580 by 30%. It has a performance comparable to Radeon HD 6990 (98% of its performance). GeForce GTX 680 is slower than GTX 590 by 9%.

GeForce GTX 680 seems to be slower than Radeon HD 7970 in Metro 2033. In Dirt 3 GTX 680 has much better performance than any AMD product. Other tests suggest that GTX 680 is a better solution if you are planning to upgrade your graphics card in a near future. Fudzilla reported today that GTX 680 may be available from $499. Multiple pages are now listing new GTX model in a price $550-580.

Here is the full detailed comparison in separate tables for three resolutions 2560×1600/1920×1080/1680×1050:

2560×1600

GeForce GTX 680 Performance [2560x1600] vsHD 7970HD 6990GTX 590GTX 580
Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 0xAA]
103%
77%
94%
142%
Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 4xAA]
105%
90%
88%
136%
Crysis 2 [DirectX 9]
95%
85%
81%
123%
Crysis 2 [DirectX 11]
117%
123%
89%
134%
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [High Preset]
106%
97%
88%
136%
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [Ultra Preset]
106%
90%
84%
130%
videocardz.com
Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [0xAA]
133%
100%
101%
150%
Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [4xAA]
118%
86%
91%
141%
Metro 2033 [AAA]
99%
77%
93%
129%
Metro 2033 [4xAA]
93%
67%
83%
120%
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 0xAA]
116%
115%
95%
132%
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 8xAA]
133%
108%
81%
124%
AVERAGE
110%
93%
89%
133%

1920×1080

GeForce GTX 680 Performance [1920x1080] vsHD 7970HD 6990GTX 590GTX 580
3DMark 11 Extreme Preset
116%
96%
91%
133%
Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 0xAA]
115%
87%
104%
152%
Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 4xAA]
113%
93%
93%
139%
Crysis 2 [DirectX 9]
104%
97%
95%
123%
Crysis 2 [DirectX 11]
125%
126%
95%
139%
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [High Preset]
107%
110%
87%
127%
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [Ultra Preset]
112%
108%
86%
128%
videocardz.com
Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [0xAA]
141%
105%
100%
147%
Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [8xAA]
122%
90%
91%
133%
Metro 2033 [AAA]
88%
74%
86%
118%
Metro 2033 [4xAA]
104%
88%
98%
133%
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 0xAA]
119%
127%
99%
107%
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 8xAA]
136%
115%
91%
124%
HAWK X [8xAA, Tessellation Enabled]
115%
83%
72%
101%
HAWK X [8xAA, Tessellation Disabled]
140%
90%
83%
107%
AVERAGE
117%
99%
91%
127%

1680×1050

GeForce GTX 680 Performance [1680x1050] vsHD 7970HD 6990GTX 590GTX 580
Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 0xAA]
118%
88%
105%
153%
Battlefield 3 [Ultra Details 4xAA]
115%
95%
94%
139%
Crysis 2 [DirectX 9]
103%
99%
98%
112%
Crysis 2 [DirectX 11]
125%
125%
95%
138%
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [High Preset]
113%
122%
94%
129%
Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim [Ultra Preset]
114%
114%
88%
123%
videocardz.com
Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [0xAA]
142%
106%
102%
146%
Dirt 3 Ultra Preset [4xAA]
127%
89%
91%
134%
Metro 2033 [AAA]
105%
93%
96%
131%
Metro 2033 [4xAA]
93%
75%
86%
129%
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 0xAA]
109%
120%
97%
104%
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (x64) [Ultra 8xAA]
135%
116%
91%
122%
AVERAGE
117%
104%
95%
130%
  • Louish1982

    Well if the 680gtx can be easily over clocked aside the auto oc in it results are ok but if not 7970 is better… &970 has more ram and is sold under clocked takes like 30 seconds to boost 15% or 20% on any hardware and sample as moving a slidder. I was afraid to have some buyers guilt since a bought 2 gigabyte 7970 wind force 3x but from what i see now i am glad i did i would want a 680 gtx anyway. I guess gk110 will be a real monster though….

  • not such a noob like you

    well ,,, i dont like iwhat i saw. Only 17% better than HD7970 , and   everybody know the HD7970 can do a lot better than this.
    Now the true question is:
     Who is better at max OC?
     I want to know if GTX6860 can better in OC.

  • Carl Hill

    Haters going to hate!

  • not such a noob like you

     I hope you are not talking about me. Becouse i dont have Nvidia. i jst want a fair comparation. I think nvidia make a Auto-overclock , unfair.
    Streange thing too ,is the idle clock at 702Mhz , and the normal operation a 1000mhz and than 1058mhz at full load.This looks like a cheat system .I think the original specs of gtx680 was more slower than hd7970 ,but if this auto-OC ,and unknowed OC performance ,its hard to say what is better.
     i think the gtx680 dont have more than 30% in OC ,and the AMD can do a lot more than 30% in OC. this means the both GPUs have the same performance, but Nvidia only to say they have the best card ,put more agressive clock in default on to say they have the best gpu on the market .As 70% of user dont make OC ,this means they will prefer to buy a fast GPU in deafult and not a slower GPU  in deafult clock ,but this same GPU can make a OC  with 70% . 
    I prefer to buy a GPU with a OC from Gigabyte or sapphire ,and dont make any OC on my gpu .

  • Pingback: NVIDIA Kepler (GTX 600) | Discussion Thread - Page 22

  • Eastrod

    I don’t mind when nvidia haters get on forums and complain as long as they know what they’re talking about. The stock clocks are meant to be the best performance while minimizing the probability of failure. These setting are always much lower than what the card can actually handle for liability reasons – if you want to overclock then it is your responsibility if the card fails. The 680 looks like it will beat the 7970 by about 15%. Yes, you can OC the 7970 with sliders as you can with any nvidia card as well.

    The reason no one has compared the 680 and 7970 at max overclock is because the only information we have are leaks and rumours. Also, the standard clock of the 680 looks like it will be ~1000MHz. The 700MHz at idle is an UNDERclock to save power when you aren’t gaming and the small 50MHz boost for intense graphical scenes (explosions, mmo raids etc.) will still be in effect if you overclock the card. For example, when I get my 680 I will overclock it to, say 1100MHz to start. That means that at idle it will run at 800MHz underclocked for power savings and 1150MHz boost during intense gaming scenes.

    Also, the 680 supports 4 monitors on one card and when the 4GB DDR5 model comes out, it will easily handle 5760×1080 with 3D vision. Eyefinity was the only real advantage ATI had over nvidia while nvidia has GPU-run physX and now TXAA as well. I used to swear by AMD but I’m no die-hard; if your company can’t deliver on CPU’s or GPU’s then I’ll find another company that can. My last build I switched over and until AMD makes a comeback, I’ll be sticking with intel and nvidia.

  • Pingback: NVIDIA Kepler GeForce 600 Series | News/Discussion Thread - Page 2

  • not such a noob like you

    You are a idiot , you dont know anything about strategy, you think the Nvidia is the best becouse they puted a high deault clock.
     Dont forget,  even AMD and Nvidia ,leave more room to let the companys like gigabyte or sapphire ,putting their deaulft clock.
     Its prtty nomal to see a HD7970 with more than 1Ghz, but this is part of the strategy .AMD show a reference with 925Mhz ,and and for example, Sapphire make  the same GPU with a beter cooler and with 1050Mhz of default clock.
     This is for sell more. You are right to think Even amd and Nvidia put the  deaful clock as stable as posible. But they think about the companys too.
      I am not sure if the Nvidia can do 40% more in OC, and this is m point.
     GTX680 is  in AVG 18% more fast than AMD, but everybody know the HD7970 can do a lot more with OC,
     Now try to understand , if the HD7970 can do 40% or 50% more in OC ,this means the deafult clock are too lower than is possible. There are a lot peaple worryed about to make a OC ,especialy when you know some GPUs dont have a huge OC.
     I will give to you my GPU as example.
     I have HD6870 from Sapphire, 875Mhz with 1250Mhz of memory.
     I already tested my best OC is 890Mhz on core and 1255Mhz of memory.
    I cant use anu software mod for voltage.
     This means my card is not so save for OC and the Sapphire locked the OC.
     But as i said there are  others companys that allow the OC ,but in mosted of cases we cant to get 50% in OC.
     But lets say, the deafult of my GPU were 600Mhz and not 875Mhz, Normaly everybody will get a lot worried about to get 1Ghz in OC.And this OC its a HUGE OC.
      I will not buy a GPU to make OC, but its a lot more confortable to know your GPU can do 50% more OC .
     So if you need more 20% ,its Ok,becouse you are a lot far away from the limit.
     But  now talking about the GTX680.
     I think GTX680 is fast as HD7970 , but as everybody didnt know about the specs ,now everybody thinks the Nvidia “NEVER” changed the deafult clocks.
     Now we know the GTX680 can run at 1Ghz, and with this clock ,can win the battle.
     But  my logic its pretty simple, if the GTX680 cant to do 40% or 50% like the HD7970 does,this means the GTX680 is fast like HD7970 ,but nvidia choose to put a high deafult clock.
     You are saying i hate Nvidia, this is not the true, becouse i want to have the 3d vision and i want a fast GPU to run my games with performance and Quality, what AMD dont have a Quality in 3D glasses.
     But you are acting like a fanatic football fan. and i am acting like analyst person.
     the HD7970 is pretty save at 1Ghz too ,but part of the stratagy of the GPU is, to make it with Lower temps, lower comsumption ,lower noise. And with 1Ghz this means ,is needed a little more  cooler and the GPU will use more energy.
     Todays GPUs problem are the comsumption ,that is why AMD puted at 925Mhz, and to give more room to the companys.
    The true is, if the GTX680 cant to  offer the same OC than HD7970 does,  you jus need to make the math and to understand the GTX680 was clocked a little higher to beat HD7970 in deafult clock ,but at maximum ,  both does the same performance.
     So you are acting like a Fanboy not me. i am just saying all this things ,becouse if i were Nvidia i used this stratagy.
    70% of the peaple dont like to make OC , and this 70% trust 97% in the deafult clock, so for these players its pretty important to have a fast deafult GPU than a  slower GPU in the deafult Clock ,but with a HUGE OC, becouse  we lose the warranty.
    I am prety sure the GTX680 is more fast than HD7970 ,but only becouse the GTX680 have the deafult more high, and if both gpus at max OC ,both have the same performance.
    But to prove i am right or wrong, we must to know if the gtx680 can make the same OC than HD7970 , if the GTX680 does 10% less in OC, this means the deafult clock was upped to 10% high.
     You can like of some company ,but you need to learn more about strategy.
     i prefer to but a GPU with high deafult clock with only 5% in OC, (this means the GPU was tested enough and can run at the limit all the time)
    Than to buy a GPU with low deafult clock ,but with a 70% in OC.
     This is my point. Noone say the HD7970 with 1400Mhz is better than GTX680 ,becouse the deafult clock is what better, got my point?
     Lets say the HD7970 can beat the gtx680 in performance  in OC ,but the GTX680 will be the winner becouse is the deafult clock what metters for 90% of users.
     So if the AMD puted the HD7970 at 1,2Ghz as deafult clock ,but only with 8% in OC , probably the  GTX680 coulnd´t not beat the HD7970.
    I think now you can understand my point of view.

    Sorry for my english , i tryed to use the google ,but sometimes the translations from google dont make any sense. English to my language /from my language to english.

  • dect6.0

    This is rubbish… AMD should have released their card with at least 1000core too.  If I run my 7970 at the same clocks I am as fast and faster in some then then 680 with a Bulldozer.  Not impressed, except the wattage.  nVidia caught up with wattage performance for sure.  

  • dect6.0

    I AM 100% agreeing with you… the 7970 wins this round for sure…

  • dect6.0

    the 7970 can run OC maxed on “stock voltages” with slight fan improvement… are you kidding me about failure..  nvidia totally up’d their clock some to make the max 17% happen… you wanna bet????

  • dect6.0

    Your viewpoint was way over done… AMD should have stock clocked the 7970 at least to 1000core.  Exactly why nvidia is putting there price lower then the 7970.  If AMD was to lower their price, 7970 is a much better option… 

  • hmm

    I would have thought the 580 would come last of these four cards.