Radeon HD 7000:  HD 7790 |  HD 7850 |  HD 7870 |  HD 7870 XT |  HD 7950 |  HD 7970 |  HD 7990 |  Radeon HD 8000:  HD 8750 |  HD 8770 |  HD 8850 |  HD 8870 |  HD 8950 |  HD 8970 |  HD 8990 
GeForce 600:  GTX 650 Ti Boost  |  GTX 660  |  GTX 660 Ti  |  GTX 670  |  GTX 680 |  GTX 690 |  Titan: GTX TITAN |  GeForce 700:  GTX 760  |  GTX 760 Ti  |  GTX 770  |  GTX 780 |  GTX 790 

March 16th, 2012

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680
First real tests of GeForce GTX 680 were leaked. Card is much faster than Radeon HD 7970, leaving it behind in almost every test.

Long story short, most of the benchmarks prove that GTX 680 is indeed a good construction. According to previous leaks it was meant to be much faster than Radeon HD 7970. Tests performed by HKEPC confirm this rumor. GeForce GTX 680 was tested with LN2 cooling, with clocks up to 1006 MHz for core and 6008 MHz for memory. Default clock is capped with its own profiles, 1006 MHz is base clock, but card can change the level of gpu clock to 1058 MHz due to computing demand.

HKEPC have put GTX 680 through several tests, which include 3Dmark11 (Extreme and Performance Preset), Heaven Benchmark, Lost Planet 2, Call of Duty MW3, Batman Arkham City, Power Consumption and Temperature.

Benchmarks GTX 680 is 20% Faster than Radeon HD 7970 and 50% Faster than GTX 580

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680

 GeForce GTX 680 Radeon HD 7970GTX680 vs HD7970GeForce GTX 580GTX680 vs GTX580
3DMark 11 Extreme Overall31652669118%2077152%
3DMark11 Extreme GPU Score28692424118%1905150%
3DMark11 Combined Score34212848120%2520120%
3DMark 11 Performance Overall93037713120%6578141%
3DMark11 Performance GPU Score92987406125%6027154%
3DMark11 Performance Score76557010109%6392120%
Batman Arkham City [1920x1080 8xAA]5749116%42136%
Call of Duty MW3 [1920x1080 8xAA]7474100%67110%
Heaven Benchmark46.541.5112%34.9133%
Lost Planet 273.458.5125%54.6134%
Temperature Full Load838696%8696%
Temperature Idle334082%3789%

Here are the official, and final specifications of GeForce GTX 680

 GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 580Radeon HD 7970
CoreGK-104GF-110Tahiti XT
ArchitectureKeplerFermi 2.0GCN
Process28nm40nm28nm
Transistors3.54 billion3.0 billion4.31 billion
Die Size294mm2520mm2365mm2
Engine Clock1,006MHz772MHz925MHz
Shader Units1,5365122,048
Texture Units12864128
ROPs323232
Fillrate (GTexel/s)128.852.4115.6
Memory Type256bit GDDR5384bit GDDR5384bit GDDR5
Memory Size2GB1.5GB3GB
Memory Date Rate6.0Gbps4.0Gbps5.5Gbps
Memory Bandwidth192.26GB/s192.384GB/s264GB/s
PCI-Express323
Maximum Wattage195W244W250W
Power Connectors2x 6-pin6+8-pin6+8-pin
DirectX111111.1
OpenGL4.14.14.1
GPGPUCUDA, OpenCLCUDA, OpenCLOpenCL 1.2
Maximum Monitors Output424(6 w/MST)

HKEPC test rig

Test Platform
CPUIntel Core i7 3960X (With Turbo Boost)
MotherboardASUS Rampage 4 Extreme X79 MB
MemoryGEIL Evo 2 DDR3-2200 2GB x 4 CL9
SSD / HDDCorsair Force GT 120GB
VGA

MSI GeForce GTX 580/ GeForce GTX 680 /AMD Radeon HD 7970

Power SupplyCorsair AX1200 PowerSupply
OSWindows 7 Ultimate SP1 64Bit

GeForce GTX 680 GK104 GPU

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680

A 28nm GK104 GPU is built with 1536 CUDA cores. Everything is packed onto 294mm2 die with almost 3.54 billion transistors. CUDA cores were trippled since GTX 580. GK104 is built with GigaThread Engine, which is placed between GPU and PCI-Express 3.0. GPU is divided into four graphics processing clusters (GPCs) which are connected to the same L2 cache and have all four have one Raster Engine. Every cluster has its two SMX, which is basically a streaming multiprocessor. SMX is equipped with PolyMorph Engine 2.0, which is accompanied by 192 CUDA cores. GK104 is also built with 8 Geometry Units, 32 Raster Operating Units and 128 Texture Units. Every Cluster has its own two SMXs, since every SMX has 192 cores, it makes 1536 CUDA cores in total.

GeForce GTX 680 – The Card

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680

First thing is the clock, which reaches the GHz level on base settings. Card will automatically change the clock according to demand. GTX 680 has included profiles, where the Boost Clock is set to 1058 MHz (which is reference maximum clock). Card is built with 3.56 billion of transistors, which is half the billion more than its predecessor GTX 580. Fillrate was measured at 128.8 GTexels per second which is 146% more than GTX 680 and 11% more than Radeon HD 7970. Card has a similar bandwidth to GTX 580 of 192 GB/s. PCI-Express was updated to version 3.0.

NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680

GeForce GTX 680 has a support for operations on four monitors simultaneously. Since card has four outputs for displaying devices (HDMI, DisplayPort and two DVI-DL) it is possible to connect devices to all of them, and operate on multiple displays at once. This setting has a support of 3D Vision Surround technology. Every gamer that has heard of 3D Vision from NVIDIA will understand how interesting this option can be. Connecting three of four displays and play on them with stereoscopic 3D support may be quite a fun.

New Anti-Aliasing Algorithm TXAA

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680

As we reported earlier, NVIDIA was prepaing a new anti-aliasing algoritm, which was supposed to increse image quality without decreasing framerate. It was comparable to 8xMSAA but much better. TXAA stands for super-efficient temporal anti-aliasing algorithm. It has two main levels TXAA1 and TXAA2. TXAA1 can be comparable to offer quality similar to 16 x MSAA, but performance penalty of 2xMSAA. TXAA2 is actually even better solution, there is no algorithm which would offer this quality of anti-aliasing. Performance penalty is measured to be at the level of 4xMSAA. There are few games which natively support this algorithm. To enable it we need to use NVIDIA’s Control Panel.

Adaptive VSync and GPU Boost

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680 GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Leaks Out, Leaves HD 7970 Behind geforce gtx 680

NVIDIA has presented a new VSync technology, which is mainly offered for gamers. Adaptive VSync is a good tool, when framerate is too slow or too fast. What new Adaptive VSync is a technology which will automatically remove the cap when framerate reaches critical 30 or less frames per second. Since low framerates offer noticeable lag, and high framerates offer page-tearing , Adaptive VSync is said to soften those transitions by making them more organic.

 

  • Hakagyi

    i want see  of the 1536 CUDA performance in gpu render test !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Loay Soudi

    im almost sure this benchmarks are FAKE, at least regarding the weird hd7970 scores !!!, yes it is, cz my stock sapphire hd7970 gets 3dmark 11 score of X2825 overall and X2569 GPU, and i have a slower CPU (intel 2600K), a very slow ram (kingstone ValueRAM 1333mhz) and a less powerful PSU, for gods sake, how could the reviewer get those low scores for the hd7970 with an i7 3960X, a 2200mhz ram and a monstrous PSU ?!! i really do believe this is one of Nvidia usual treacherous tricks trying to manipulate cutomers to not buy hd7970 and wait for their holy sacred kepler !! only time will tell if im wrong.

  • BestJinjo

    Vesahay: “Can i have te portal to the dimension where outpowered 680 gtx will beat much faster 7970 as you claim? Youre unbelieveable fan boy in complete denial if you ever believe in that bedtime story. Judging by the spec’s, AMD is gonna shout “goodnight Nvidia” at launch day”

    Looks like no fanboism was involved in the making of GTX680:

    1) Better performance/watt2) Better performance/mm^2
    3) Better performance/transistor
    All that on 256-bit bus with 72GB/sec lower memory bandwidth. The best thing that happened for AMD is that NV wasn’t able to launch GK110 on time. This gives AMD a chance to start working on a faster clocked HD7970 version with 2304 SPs. 

    Hopefully the rest of GTX600 line-up is impressive as well. It’s time we get some competition in the marketplace with fairly unremarkable prices of HD7770, HD7950 cards, etc.

  • http://videocardz.com VideoCardz

     I personally think that GTX 670 may actually offer performance of Radeon HD 7970. AMD will try to sustain the fight by releasing their dual-gpu card, but since NVIDIA is also planning a dual GK104 solution, we may have a clear winner this year.

  • Loay Soudi

    two more thing;
    #1 if those scores are true why are nvidia still hiding them (hence: this is a leak) . . . cough no im not saying it is an nvidia fanboy propaganda cough, but if those where true obviously nvidia would have declared them officially and left them float around the geek websites asap to slow down hd7970 sales and make ppl wait for there again the holy sacred kepler !!

    #2 nvidia is using the boost technology which is basically and automatic overclock, my sapphire hd7970 gets X3319 overall and X3045 gpu scores in 3dmark 11 when overclocked to 1125 core and 1575 memory, temps are 34C idle 78-80C 100% load on furmark with Xtreme burn in active, and yes it has the >>STOCK COOLER<<, from where in hell did the reviewer get those unrealistic temps for a an unoverclocked hd7970.

  • http://videocardz.com VideoCardz

     First is simple, this card is now being sent to reviewers. Since all of them have to declare not to distribute any information before release date NVIDIA cannot release any information since those reviews are being written as we speak. This review is definately not what has NVIDIA planned (HKEPC will probably be fined or they will never recieve any card for tests again).

    As for temperatures, if you didn’t already noticed, this card was tested without PC case, and what is more it was with LN2 cooled processors. If anyone thinks these information is not important then there is no point in reading this review was so ever. Temperatures of GTX 680 in HKEPC review are in my opinion not real, and represent temp of environment in which most of gpus dont work daily.

  • Bjammzz

    1920×1080? This is at the very least, a horrible review. For anyone who is gaming at 1080p they can get a card that costs 1/2 as much that will run almost all games at solid rates. These high-end cards are for high resolution gaming either with one monitor or several. They should be running 1440p/1600p.

    I really do hope these provide some healthy competition for the AMD card. One, they are released ~4 months later so they should and no matter who is ahead, competition is good for us. Remember the 8800GTX days? Where ATI had nothing to compete with? That’s why we had to pay a ridiculous amount of money for them.

    I can’t wait to get some real benchmarks! I have a feeling the gap at higher resolutions will be a lot, lot less. I don’t understand why Nvidia would not be sending out samples to reviews and have everyone sing their praises if there card was/is really THAT good. I guess time will tell and hopefully it will lead to a price war (I personally feel the 7970′s are overpriced by about 100 dollars and expect to see them drop in price by at least 50 shortly after the launch of Nvidia’s cards)

  • Louish1982

    These benchmark are crap 7970 scores much higher and at a lower temp, usually amd cards run better on high 14401600 resolution and multi display setup since they have more ram and eyefinity software is more polished. I never see nvidia show benchmark on higher resolution i wonder why lol. Also some games are just optimized for nvidia cards maybe gk104 is a bit faster than stock 7970 as nvidia cars are generally faster but not that much for real…gk110 was supposed to be the real top dog. Can t wait to see real reviews…I don t think gk104 will make me regret my dual 7970..

  • not such a noob like you

    SO if the Nvidia can do a auto-overclock , so why the  reviewer dont show the true  power of the GTX680 in full OC ?and no more about the AUTO OC.
     So this is like a cheater system. there are a lot of stupid peaple ,who are thinking, the GTX680 is a monster,but this card does a auto,OC and this is not the real performance. Think about the same thing on the AMD HD7970 , than from 925/ to 1300Mhz , ..man  the GTX680 never will get hd7970 . Ofcourse , we dont know if GTX680 cand do more 30% or 50% more in OC. Becouse if the GTX680 cant to o a 30% of OC, The real winner is the HD7970.
     This means , on next generation , the Auto-O  will apper not only on GTX680. 
     I think the AMD could put the HD7970 with at last 1000Mhz.

  • not such a noob like you

    SO if the Nvidia can do a auto-overclock , so why the  reviewer dont show the true  power of the GTX680 in full OC ?and no more about the AUTO OC.
     So this is like a cheater system. there are a lot of stupid peaple ,who are thinking, the GTX680 is a monster,but this card does a auto,OC and this is not the real performance. Think about the same thing on the AMD HD7970 , than from 925/ to 1300Mhz , ..man  the GTX680 never will get hd7970 . Ofcourse , we dont know if GTX680 cand do more 30% or 50% more in OC. Becouse if the GTX680 cant to o a 30% of OC, The real winner is the HD7970.
     This means , on next generation , the Auto-O  will apper not only on GTX680. 
     I think the AMD could put the HD7970 with at last 1000Mhz.

  • Ale5800

    price for the 2gb version? and for the 4gb?

  • BestJinjo

    It’s not cheating. It’s like Intel’s Turbo Boost. On average, the CPU or GPU never use up the maximum TDP limit in programs. For example, Sandy Bridge might only be drawing 80W of power. In that case, Intel allows the chip to turbo boost 1-4 bins depending on how loaded the CPU is to reach a maximum allowable TDP limit of 95W.

    Nvidia’s maximum TDP is 195W. They are just Auto OCing to get there since on average it will use up less power.

    That would be similar to HD7970 overclocking above 925mhz. Unfortunately AMD didn’t introduce this feature.

    Reviews should focus on performance OUT OF THE BOX because that’s what a consumer will get after paying $550. Testing with TurboBoost enabled on GK104 is how the card comes out of the box. No different than testing a factoy pre-overclocked Asus Direct CUII, Gigabyte Windforce etc. Should those cards be underclocked back to factory 925mhz settings? Don’t be ridiculous. 

    Then there should be a separate section for maximum performance in Overclocked vs. Overclocked states. 

  • BestJinjo

     ”my sapphire hd7970 gets X3319 overall and X3045 gpu scores in 3dmark 11 when overclocked to 1125 core and 1575 memory,”
    Ok and how much power is your card using? Nvidia’s card will give you that performance out of the box with no overclocking required, lower power consumption, Active Vsync, new TXAA antialising mode, transferable lifetime warranty with EVGA, and also overclocking room to boot. HD7970 with reference cooler is loud. But again, hardly anyone will buy them with reference coolers. 

    Either way, think about it logically, GK104 runs at 0.987V at 1006 mhz, has a smaller 294mm^2 die. HD7970 has a larger die, runs at higher voltage. It makes sense why HD7970 would run hotter. Not like it matters anyway. If one GPU runs at 60*C and another at 80*C, both are running well below the 100-105*C threshold. GPU temperature is meaningless. All that’s important is power consumption and overclocking headroom relative to performance. If HD7970 ran at 35*C and had 1% overclocking headroom would you care? GPU temperature is also a function of how good the cooler is. It’s a pretty useless metric.

  • http://videocardz.com VideoCardz

     Probably around $600.